I dont know Jamie Gold.
Ive never seen him play.
I dont know this crispin bloke.
Ive heard jamie gold is a dumbass.
so, my take on this, please correct me if im wrong.
1. Gold gets given a $10k buyin from bodog, for being a good player.
2. Gold accepts.
3. Gold meets crispin.
4. Crispin is broke.
5. Crispin harasses gold.
6. Crispins gets some not famous people who were famous for 5 mins to play for Bodog.
7. Bodog wont give crispin his $10k entry.
8. Gold feels sorry and says ill share some profits.
9. Gold gets AA every hand and wins.
10. Crispin thinks hes won $6million.
This case to me is defined by 2 key points if its under UK contract/paper law.
1. Did gold sign anything to say he would give Crispin half.
2. Were their witnesses that hears him say and agree to "gold giving crispin half".
Splitting profits and donating some profits is differnt. I won $65k. If before this i said to TP ill donate some to a TP freeroll if i win id donate say $500. TP then thinks were having a $37.5k freeroll. No question, in a court of law, i win hands down.
I dont get what kind of case this crispin has.
|