see, my problem isnt that the ball was (ruled) touched by the OU guy before the UO guy(which it was obvouisly was touched by Oregon before Oklahoma), it was that they said OU was the first to touch it with "conclusive evidence", no matter the 10-yard rule. Oregon was the first to touch it and it was a yard (at least from the 45) away from being a legal recovery by UO. There was no way it was "conclusive evidence", not to mention OU also recovered the onside kick, and handed the ball to the ref, they made 3 HORRIBLE calls in the last minute and 1/2 of the ga,e
If that doesn't make sense then fuck you and fuck the pac 10.
Edit: i am drunk and am still pissed 7 hours after the game ended and sorry if this post offended anyone
Last edited by left68wing; 09-17-06 at 02:39 AM.
|