I don't disagree with his play (it was a bit more aggro than I would have been, but I cant say I disagree), but I felt the reason he did well, was because his opponents at the 2nd table simply let him run over them. He was reraised exactly one time all game, and he was check raised on CBs maybe 3-5 times max. Now I would say the reason he played so aggro and CBed every single flop was bc of the table -- but in the other table he played the same way.
He played smart in the fact that he was doing the betting 90% of the time, otherwise he was folding (in other word he wasnt involved in big pots unless he was doing the betting -- although he was often betting empty) . But I just didnt feel I learned much from the video, and would like to see him change gears when the table adapts to him (as they should have but didnt)
__________________
"Most of the money you'll win at poker comes not from the brilliance of your own play, but from the ineptitude of your opponents."
|