View Single Post
  #3  
Old 11-02-05, 02:52 PM
Talking Poker's Avatar
Talking Poker Talking Poker is offline
Adminimus Maximus
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Coast
Posts: 27,480
Talking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Points
Default

That's part of his schtick.

As for how I would play it, I am assuming you mean from the non-Matusow side of things, right? If so, this is actually close to how I would have played it.

Against a random player, I would play it differently (and check the flop), but against Mike, I disagreed with what Norman Chad was saying and think they guy played it beautifully. Remember, Mike is capable of making a big bluff (even all in) with nothing IF he thinks you have nothing and will fold. And with this board, I have to think the best way to entice Mike to do that is to go ahead and fire at the flop.
__________________

Got RakeBack?
27% at Full Tilt | 33% at Cake Poker | 30% at Carbon Poker