Thread: The New Brian
View Single Post
  #7  
Old 10-24-05, 05:37 PM
BlibbityBlabbity's Avatar
BlibbityBlabbity BlibbityBlabbity is offline
Run Silent || Run Deep
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,403
BlibbityBlabbity has between 750 and 999 Rep PointsBlibbityBlabbity has between 750 and 999 Rep PointsBlibbityBlabbity has between 750 and 999 Rep PointsBlibbityBlabbity has between 750 and 999 Rep PointsBlibbityBlabbity has between 750 and 999 Rep PointsBlibbityBlabbity has between 750 and 999 Rep PointsBlibbityBlabbity has between 750 and 999 Rep Points
Default

If you just want to see if you can get say $400-$600 from $3-$20 then I guess it could be an interesting experiment. If you are saying that this is a good idea (as anything more than an experiment), then I would have to disagree.

One question.... You win the $300 for 1st and sit at the 30/60 table. What are you shooting for at this point? $600, $1000, or just play till its gone? I don't mean that sarcastically, if you don't have a goal for it then it will be the latter at that limit with that bankroll, IMO.

You could look at this like parlaying a small buyin tourney into a big event. Say you played a SNG for $10 and won, bought into a $100, etc etc with the goal of getting $10000 to get into a major tourney while not considering ever playing in a major event buying in directly with "your own" money. Then again you could aslo realize that when you are up to the $1000 level you HAVE $1000 and might not want to throw it on a single tourney. Also like the step tourneys (in a way)
__________________
Your biggest edge in a HORSE tourney is knowing that the game just changed from Razz to 7 Stud. - BB

http://www.talkingpoker.com/forum/blog.php?u=64

Last edited by BlibbityBlabbity; 10-24-05 at 05:40 PM.