Looking at my last 22k or so 6 max hands for comparison (keep in mind, mine are all 5/10).....
Our stats are fairly similar, but my BB/100 is more than double what yours is. Because of the different stakes, my earn rate per 100 hands is 4 times what yours is. and believe it or not, my numbers are actually skewed down, as I won quite a bit more in the previous hands did I did on this 22k sample.
I can be more detailed for you later if you like, but the general differences I am seeing right now:
I am a bit looser than you preflop.
I am a bit more aggressive than you across the board (see below).
I call a little bit more than you on the river (this give me a lower showdown percentage, but I think it makes me more money).
The one huge difference I see is check raises. You check raise almost three times as often as I do. Your CR breakdown is roughly: 70% flop, 30% turn, and 1% river. Mine is 6% flop, 80% turn, and 13% river. That is a HUGE difference between us.
Aggression. Looking at out stats, I *thought* I was more aggressive than you, but your aggression factor is over 3. Mine is just under 2. Maybe this is because of the check raises...?
All in all, I think your numbers look good. To get them to look more like mine (not saying that would necessarily be a good thing), you would need to play a few more hands, raise a litte more preflop, and play a little more straightforward poker in general: Less check raises, slightly more betting for value ( that's a guess), slightly less folding on the river.
All in all though, I think you should be happy with these results.
|