View Single Post
  #2  
Old 11-26-07, 08:45 PM
Talking Poker's Avatar
Talking Poker Talking Poker is offline
Adminimus Maximus
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Coast
Posts: 27,480
Talking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep PointsTalking Poker has between 3000 and 3499 Rep Points
Default

Good article. I'm surprised not a single person commented.

One thing I'd like to counter though:

Don't forget the cost of OVERBETTING by that same $1. If your opponent would call a maximum $50 value bet on the river and you bet $49, yes, that cost you $1, and yes, that adds up over time. But if you bet $51 and your opponent folds, THAT cost you $50! Whoa.... It doesn't take a genius to realize that bet sizing mistake adds up a LOT faster than the $1 mistakes you were describing.

And now one thing I'd like to add:

I definitely agree that bet sizing is extremely important... but I think it's especially important on earlier streets so you can build a pot that allows you to get paid off a HIGHER maximim than it would have been if you were underbetting (assume strong flopped hand like the flush derscribed above). Take those 50% and 60% of pot bets you mentioned. If you could have made those 67-75% bets and still gotten the same calls, you'd be setting yourself to win a MUCH larger pot by the time you value bet the river.

__________________

Got RakeBack?
27% at Full Tilt | 33% at Cake Poker | 30% at Carbon Poker