Holy shit! I don't go broke on this hand exactly never.
Honestly, I don't know how he can put villain on EXACTLY AT when Ax (x being ANY other card, not just 9 and lower) makes sense too. I have to think that you get paid off by AQ/AJ/etc with a river raise more often than villain has exactly AT.
The more I think about it, the more I don't like this "call." In a tourney, I'd be REALLY impressed, but in a cash game, I think this is an error. It sure looks cool though.
|