The TalkingPoker.com Forum

The TalkingPoker.com Forum (http://www.talkingpoker.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Poker Discussion (http://www.talkingpoker.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Need Math Whiz (http://www.talkingpoker.com/forum/showthread.php?t=5162)

Govman6767 01-16-06 02:45 AM

Need Math Whiz
 
All you math junkies figure this one out

I played 243 hands ran into quads 3 times while not making a flush or boat
can someone break this down in to a probability
not just making the flush or boat but somone getting quads 3 times

eejit101 01-16-06 11:16 AM

this should be right.
 
1,712,304 / 44 = 38,916 this means that in every 38,916 times the cards are dealt, quads will occur only once.

so you play 243 hands. this number will be divided - 38916/243 = 160ish.

so in 243 hand there is a 1 in 160 chance you will make quads.the odds of making this three times will simply be 160 x 160 x 160 = 1 in 4.1 million.

wow, thats steep if ive done it right.

GeoffM 01-16-06 11:56 AM

If you did do it right, you forgot to factor in 10 hands being dealt, not 1.

Talking Poker 01-16-06 11:56 AM

I didn't check your math at all, but he said he RAN INTO quads 3 times - not that he HAD QUADS three times. So I believe each of your numbers would need to be divided by 9 (assuming 9 opponents - he didn't say), which, assuming everything else you did was true and I haven't even looked at) would be: 18*18*18 = 5832. Much more reasonable looking...

kmb13592 01-16-06 12:21 PM

Do you have any idea what you are doing, or did you just decide to write random number down.

I am actually currently taking an AP statistics class, and we just did a unit on probability. I'll get back to you with the answer in a little bit, this problem is very complex.

You need to provide the number of people at the table in order to figure this problem out, so how many people were playing at the table.

eejit101 01-16-06 12:24 PM

lol, i didnt write random numbers down.

i forgot about ten hands, 9 others. so im working it out to around 500,000 to one on running into quads three times in 234 hands.

HEwong 01-16-06 12:26 PM

lol thats seems like a lot of worthless thinking lol since he ran into wuads 3 times , not caught quads 3 times

Talking Poker 01-16-06 12:51 PM

I don't think so. See my above post.

melioris 01-16-06 12:57 PM

ok, so you ran into quads three times in roughly 250 hands? Just out of curiousity, does that mean you were involved in each hand with the quads? I am not sure what is going on with the flush house words you wrote, but I surmise that you are trying to say you didn't have a great hand against the quads.

When something like that happens to me I figure the odds to be 1/a lot. Figuring out the exact number isn't really worth it unless you need the number for your bad beat story. And if that is what you want the number for, just make it up.

In my line of work we have a term for something like this. It is "rare squared". In your case it would be "rare cubed".

PShabi 01-16-06 01:00 PM

Great point.

badblood44 01-16-06 02:19 PM

It's the binomial distribution:



P = probability of success, or probability of having 4 of a kind in a hold 'em hand.
N = number of trials, or number of players * number of hands
n = number of successes, or in this case 3

MAYHEM45 01-16-06 02:24 PM

Ahh, Eng. Stats 220, my FAVOURITE class. :rolleyes:

HEwong 01-16-06 02:25 PM

wtf lol.. im glad i never took statistics

Govman6767 01-16-06 07:39 PM

No I ran into quads 3 times
twice at a 6 person N/L table once at a 9 person N/L tourny
but according to your numbers I should have played the lottery instead

thrash1294 01-16-06 07:44 PM

If it make you feel better I flop 3 nut flushes yesterday and got beat by 3 str
flushes on all three and river beats none the less, but it was limit games.Stars is starting make me mad:mad: was 408 hands.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2004-2008 TalkingPoker.com