That brings up a question
 

After JunYun's last post it brings up a good Q.... what do you guys feel are the softest (preferably NL) tables around and what sites? Include player types (chasers, reckless, calling stations etc)

This is in general, without specifics like you asked for. There are bad players at all the sites, but I have to say the WORST I have seen are at .

My theory is that because this is a Casino offshoot site, a higher than usual percentage of the players there are gamblers playing poker - not poker players.

noble by far (but i've only played at party, stars, noble, and pacific) for .50/1 limit. other than that... i can say the softest of those $25 NL would be party.

hmmmm
 

Id say whatever site I'am playing on that day!!! :)

I'm in the mood to write, so I'll give impressions on the sites I've played on, above and beyond the "player" characteristics:

PartyPoker + Skins
-Chasers, reckless, calling stations, etc. You'll find it all here. You will certainly run into your fair share of sharks, but the fish make up for it.
-These players have helped tremendously as I built my bankroll. And they still do. All levels - including .50/1 (L) to the higher end NL games, though I haven't gotten past $200NL yet.
-Tournament players are terrible, especially the Party SnG players.
-Party MTT structure is terrible. Save MTT money for somewhere else like Stars or Full Tilt - both have good stuctures.
-Obviously, great bonuses and the easiest to clear throughout the internet!

Full Tilt Poker
-Players are tighter than you might expect. Yes, as in all sites, there are some good players and some terrible players, but IMO, this site is bad for action.
-Can still definitely be lucrative, but when I play on FTP, I usually open up and see more flops and raise more, since I have found that the majority of players are tight and passive.
-Weak tournament players at the lower levels, with great MTT structure.
-The software is among the best, but the game selection is dismal at times, because of the 2500-3000 active player average. Reminds me of Stars circa 3/4 years ago.
-Good bonus, but a pain to clear. Given out in increments.

PokerStars
-Again, tighter than you would find on Party. I have respect for Stars players, but that doesn't mean we should be scared of them. If I wasn't for the continual bonuses offered by Party + Skins, Stars would be my primary poker site.
-Tournament players are MUCH better than you would find anywhere else, with the slight exception of maybe UltimateBet. (But that's speculation - I've never played there.)
-Hold'em ring games with 9 players... better than 10, as you'll find on Party.
-Rare bonuses, too bad.

Noble Poker
-Weak all around. Lots of chasers / calling stations in the limit games.
-I haven't played Noble NL, so I can't speak on that...
-Limited tournament exposure, but what I have seen doesn't impress me.
-Too bad the software sucks.

Pacific Poker
-Limit action is GREAT, and if it wasn't for the bonuses I'm always whoring, I would spend considerable time here.
-Weak players, very comparable to Noble, IMO.
-The money "slider" is extremely difficult to maneuver, and thus playing NL games or tournaments is just frustrating.

Mirabelle
-LOL... just save your money. The 5 people online at any given time are TERRIBLE, but this is probably the worst software I've ever seen.

That's all I can think of for now. HTH.

For O8 full ring low limits, I would have to say Paradise and Pokerroom take the prize.

Doyle's Room has a much larger percentage if sickeningly reckless and kamikaze chasers. But if your luck is with you you should be able to rake it in. Only played 1/2 NL by the way.