what the hell?
 

What...the...hell?



PokerStars Tournament game, buy-in $1.00+0.20, Level I $10/$20 No Limit, 9 players
Hand History by

SB: T$2110
BB: T$1180
UTG: T$2110
HERO (UTG+1): T$1500
MP1: T$720
MP2: T$1500
MP3: T$1420
CO: T$1490
Button: T$1470

SB posts Small Blind T$10
BB posts Big Blind T$20

Pre-flop: A:s: A:h: (T$30)
UTG folds
HERO raises to T$100
MP1 folds
MP2 folds
MP3 folds
CO folds
Button folds
SB calls T$90
BB folds

Flop: 9:h: J:s: T:h: ($220)
SB checks
HERO bets T$140
SB calls T$140

Turn: 9:h: J:s: T:h: 4:h: (T$500)
SB checks
HERO bets T$280
SB calls T$280

River: 9:h: J:s: T:h: 4:h: K:c: (T$1060)
SB checks
HERO checks

SB shows 5:s: Q:s:
SB wins T$1060 with a straight Nine to King

buy-in $1.00+0.20

(someone had to say it)

at what point will I begin to see half-competent fishes?

Why would you want to play half competent fishes?
Especially when you can play completely incompetent fishes?

BTW The plural of fish is fish.

actually, the plural can be both :p

wow, I just got leveled

Wow, you really must have changed.

Looking at some of the villains in hands posted by players who frequent the "higher stakes" players, i'd say that those type of fish are everywhere (just an issue of fish/shark ratio). Maybe we should start developing that as an independent stat for sites and tables.:thumbsup:

mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, NIT-FISH!