The TalkingPoker.com Forum

The TalkingPoker.com Forum (http://www.talkingpoker.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Poker Discussion (http://www.talkingpoker.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Sharkscope (http://www.talkingpoker.com/forum/showthread.php?t=6231)

Tony Cheval 04-07-06 02:15 AM

Also, it's not so much that I prefer UB, it's just that they had a tasty 100% reload bonus that happens to take forever to earn, so while in Rome.. ;)

eejit101 04-07-06 02:30 AM

These numbers are for STTs and MTTs. If your losing at ring games, and you are $3 a tourney in profit, play these, but my suggestion, find a way to 20 table:o

holdemstewart 04-07-06 02:38 AM

I can settle for $3 a tourament, Its still a HELL of a lot better than losing though.

eejit101 04-07-06 02:39 AM

If it makes you happy man go for it all day every day.

GL:o

holdemstewart 04-07-06 02:49 AM

Im not playing for the money as much as I am for the entertainment. So If I can do what I like to do, AND still make a profit (even a small one), I think its a win-win situatoin. :)

eejit101 04-07-06 02:54 AM

then play that tourney till you win $3 and quit man.

if you love it then do it.

Robbie Robb 04-07-06 10:47 AM

Not sure how all y'all are gettin' it to work for you. Neither Nikki or I are able to search. We type in a username, hit search...and....nothing. Thinking it was because the developers suck and somehow broke it in Firefox I tried IE. Nope, nothing there either but IE tells me there's a javascript error.

BlibbityBlabbity 04-07-06 11:33 AM

same here

SirFWALGMan 04-07-06 11:47 AM

It is Broken
 
It says I am a shark.. must be broken.

SirFWALGMan 04-07-06 11:48 AM

Bah
 
It is CASE SENSITIVE and does not always report when it fails a search. I has issues.

SirFWALGMan 04-07-06 11:54 AM

Oh and Since..
 
Since yall are bragging, 68% ROI is not too Pshabby:

SirFWALGMan 161 $11 $11 68% $1642 - pokerstars x

Talking Poker 04-07-06 12:11 PM

Actually, it's $383, total (see "Total Profit"). That's the important number, which I believe includes the buy in fees.

Talking Poker 04-07-06 12:16 PM

I think it's ridiculous that it's case sensitive. Hopefully this is an early version of it and they will improve it over time.

Robbie Robb 96 $0 $5 13% $-52
N1kita 62 $0 $2 87% $-9

And I totally don't get their ROI. How can someone have an 87% ROI with a NEGATIVE total profit? Again, it must be the fees, but to go from 87 to < 0... :confused: That's a lot of fees.

eejit101 04-07-06 12:17 PM

83% ROI baby.

MWAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

MAYHEM45 04-07-06 01:46 PM

This site is crap. Read the FAQ, sounds like it was written by a SWA, no offense.

Talking Poker 04-07-06 01:49 PM

:confused:

I don't really trust their numbers (they seem to be missing a lot of data), but it is definitely better than nothing.

MAYHEM45 04-07-06 01:52 PM

It says they miss some tourneys during prime time, but whatever, im sure they will get better in the future, although I can see this getting banned if they start charging for it. Its the same thing as poker prophecy was for party poker.

Talking Poker 04-07-06 02:06 PM

What do you mean banned? Banned by whom, and how so? It's just a database, like thepokerdb - but much more inclusive (with totals, and not just a list of cashes).

MAYHEM45 04-07-06 02:13 PM

Poker prophecy was the same thing, once money gets involved, party poker doesnt like it. Im sure stars wont mind though, Lee Jones is a pretty lenient guy.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2004-2008 TalkingPoker.com